A homeowner disputes a violation or maintenance issue
The board needs a current field record before issuing a response, approving work, or deciding whether additional action is appropriate.
Give the board a clear record before it makes the decision.
We Inspect. We Diagnose. We Document.
ArborSolutions inspects trees and landscapes, reviews proposed contractor work, and prepares written documentation for HOA boards and property managers.
We explain what we observed, whether the recommended work makes sense, what questions still need answers, and what your options are.
Common HOA Situations
They start by trying to answer a difficult question. A complaint arrives. A contractor submits a proposal. A homeowner disagrees with a recommendation. A deadline approaches. The board needs better information before taking action.
The board needs a current field record before issuing a response, approving work, or deciding whether additional action is appropriate.
Removal, pruning, irrigation upgrades, landscape replacement, or drainage work may be reasonable. The board simply wants an independent review before approval.
Residents, contractors, committee members, and board members may all have different opinions. A documented inspection helps focus the discussion on observed conditions.
Questions about defects, clearance, target exposure, or visible tree condition often require more than photographs or email descriptions.
Boards frequently need help understanding recurring irrigation, runoff, plant health, or maintenance concerns before making budgeting decisions.
When recurring irrigation problems, runoff, or declining plants affect common areas, our Landscape Inspections document the visible conditions and help the board understand what may need attention before approving maintenance changes or contractor work.
Sometimes the most important objective is simply creating a clear property record before the board makes a decision.
An on-site inspection provides a current record of the tree or landscape conditions being discussed. We explain what we observed, what may need attention, and which questions still need answers before the board acts.
A scope of work describes what the contractor proposes to do, where the work will take place, and what is included. We compare that description with conditions observed on the property and identify details that need clarification.
Received an HOA tree or landscape notice? Preserve the notice, photos of current conditions, prior correspondence, and available maintenance records before work begins.
Use the HOA evidence checklist →Your Consultant
Daniel Arrellanes is an ISA Certified Arborist, Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ), QWEL Landscape Water Auditor, and independent consulting arborist serving Santa Barbara County and San Luis Obispo County.
ArborSolutions provides inspection, diagnosis, and documentation without selling the corrective work — so there is no financial incentive tied to the outcome.
Independent by design.
Before the inspection, we agree on what the board needs reviewed. The report explains what we observed, what may need attention, and what options the board can consider.
Independent review of tree health, structure, visible defects, site conditions, and risk context when appropriate.
Review of available tree or landscape recommendations before major work, budget, or contract decisions are approved.
Field observations that help boards understand recurring landscape performance, water-use, and maintenance concerns.
Clear documentation organized for board packets, manager follow-up, contractor discussion, counsel review, or the permanent property record.
ArborSolutions can document observable tree and landscape conditions within its professional scope. The board and its counsel remain responsible for legal interpretation and enforcement procedure.
For a violation of the governing documents, California Civil Code §5850 generally limits an HOA monetary penalty to the lesser of the association’s current penalty schedule or $100 per violation.
A penalty above $100 may be imposed when a violation may result in an adverse health or safety impact on the common area or another association member’s property. Before imposing that penalty, the board must make a written finding specifying the impact in a board meeting open to members.
ArborSolutions does not decide whether the statutory exception applies. We inspect and document relevant tree or landscape conditions so the board and its advisors have a clearer factual record.
AB 130 does not require an arborist report. When the underlying issue involves a tree, vegetation, irrigation, root, or landscape condition, an independent field record may help the board and its counsel evaluate what is actually present before the board makes its own finding.
Read the AB 130 Tree & Landscape Documentation Guide
The report is organized around the board's decision: what we inspected, what the record shows, and what can reasonably happen next. The agreed assignment determines the level of detail.
What was requested, who requested it, the area reviewed, and the decision the documentation is intended to support.
Conditions visible at the time of inspection, written in direct language and separated from assumptions or reported history.
Images selected and captioned to show the condition, location, relationship, or scope question being discussed.
Items arranged by urgency, decision relevance, or need for additional information rather than presented as an undifferentiated list.
Reasonable next steps, monitoring needs, contractor questions, or further assessment requirements within the assignment scope.
What was not visible, not accessible, outside the assignment, or dependent on specialized testing or another professional discipline.
These are planning references, not a substitute for association counsel, local-agency review, water-supplier requirements, or project-specific compliance advice.
Most penalties are subject to the statutory cap. A higher penalty requires the specific health-and-safety finding and open-meeting procedure described above.
Potable-water irrigation of nonfunctional turf in HOA and common-interest-development common areas is prohibited beginning January 1, 2029, subject to the statute’s exceptions and enforcement provisions.
Water needed for trees, perennial nonturf plantings, or an immediate health-and-safety need is not prohibited by that section.
The current state MWELO regulations took effect January 2, 2025. Applicability depends on project type, landscape area, and local implementation.
Local agencies may adopt requirements that are at least as effective as the state model.
Reviewed against current state sources August 26, 2026.
The process is designed to keep the board, manager, and consultant working from the same question.
Tell us what happened, what has been proposed, who needs the documentation, and when the board expects to act.
We review the available complaint, proposal, contract language, photographs, prior reports, notices, or board questions.
Relevant tree, landscape, irrigation, target, access, and site conditions are inspected and photographed within the agreed scope.
Findings, limitations, priorities, and practical next steps are organized for board, manager, contractor, or advisor review.
These roles can work together. The distinction matters when the board needs an independent record before approving work, addressing a dispute, or making a formal finding.
Contractors provide essential field knowledge and perform the maintenance or corrective work the property requires.
ArborSolutions provides a separate, documentation-focused review before or after the work, depending on the assignment.
Current findings for budget, enforcement, maintenance, safety, and property-record decisions.
Clear documentation that organizes resident concerns, proposals, and contractor follow-up.
Independent field information for recommendations before the full board acts.
Subject-matter documentation that counsel can review alongside governing documents and legal requirements.
It is a written record of observable conditions, photographs, scope questions, priorities, practical options, and limitations prepared for a board or manager decision.
Yes, within our professional scope. We can document relevant tree and landscape conditions. The board and its counsel decide how the information relates to the law and governing documents.
Yes. We can compare the available proposal or scope language with observed conditions and identify unclear items, priorities, alternatives, or questions for follow-up.
No. The scope depends on the concern. A site consultation may be sufficient; other assignments may require a detailed inspection, written report, multi-tree review, or contractor-scope analysis.
Scope, fee, and turnaround are agreed before the inspection, so the board knows what it will receive and when. Timing depends on the assignment — a single-tree review moves faster than a multi-tree or full-landscape documentation project.
No. ArborSolutions provides consultations, inspections, reports, and documentation. We do not perform pruning, removal, landscape installation, or corrective maintenance.
Santa Barbara County and San Luis Obispo County, including communities from Carpinteria and Montecito through Santa Maria, the Santa Ynez Valley, Five Cities, San Luis Obispo, and Paso Robles.
Have more questions? Browse the Answer Library for tree, landscape, and property documentation answers.
Share the situation, what’s been proposed, and any meeting date or deadline. We’ll explain whether an inspection or written report would be useful.
Only three fields are required: your name, email, and what the board needs help deciding.